A proposed class action filed on July 17, 2026, in Dakota County, Minnesota, accuses the landlords of Glen at Burnsville Apartments of deceptive pricing and unsafe living conditions. The lawsuit, brought by a current tenant on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, claims that the property owners used undisclosed mandatory fees to make apartments appear more affordable than they actually were, in violation of consumer protection laws.
The complaint names Priderock Capital Partners, LLC, Priderock Capital Management, LLC, PRCP-Minnesota I, LLC, and PRCP-Minnesota Stone, LLC as defendants. It alleges that the advertised rental prices omitted mandatory charges such as “junk fees” that provided no meaningful benefit to tenants, as well as improperly apportioned common-area utility costs. These practices allegedly resulted in tenants paying significantly more than the advertised rent each month.
In addition to financial claims, the lawsuit cites serious habitability concerns, including failure to maintain controlled-access buildings and inadequate response to pest infestations. The plaintiffs argue that these conditions breached the implied warranty of habitability, making the apartments unsafe and unfit for occupancy.
“No tenant should be forced to discover after signing a lease that the advertised rent was not the real price of their home,” said Alexandra M. Robinson, an attorney with Nichols Kaster, PLLP, which represents the plaintiffs. “We believe Glen at Burnsville used undisclosed, mandatory fees to make apartments appear more affordable than they actually were, while also failing to provide tenants with the safe and habitable housing they were promised.”
The case seeks damages for tenants who executed leases within the past six years, as well as subclasses for those affected by specific fee practices. It also requests injunctive relief to stop the alleged deceptive practices.
Additional details about the case can be found at nka.com/GlenAtBurnsville. The case is titled Miller v. Priderock Capital Partners, LLC, et al., Case No. 19WS-CV-26-808.
